<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Communication Patterns on The Broomstick Brief</title><link>https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/tags/communication-patterns/</link><description>Recent content in Communication Patterns on The Broomstick Brief</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.147.3</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/tags/communication-patterns/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How security failures learned to sound reasonable</title><link>https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/posts/security-linguistics/</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/posts/security-linguistics/</guid><description>Modern security delusions hide inside ordinary operational language. Three small grammatical moves do most of the work, and a quiet substitution test exposes them.</description></item><item><title>How some ideas outlast their own evidence</title><link>https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/posts/ideas-surviving-evidence/</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/posts/ideas-surviving-evidence/</guid><description>Some phrases keep returning in board papers and post-incident reviews regardless of how often they fail. A look at the other jobs they may be doing, and why reform efforts that target the language tend to lose to the function.</description></item></channel></rss>