<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Defence-in-Depth on The Broomstick Brief</title><link>https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/tags/defence-in-depth/</link><description>Recent content in Defence-in-Depth on The Broomstick Brief</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.147.3</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/tags/defence-in-depth/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The phrase survived. The definition did not.</title><link>https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/posts/defence-in-depth/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/posts/defence-in-depth/</guid><description>On defence in depth, and what the phrase originally defined: real depth means each successful compromise changes the attacker&amp;#39;s problem.</description></item></channel></rss>