<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Export Controls on The Broomstick Brief</title><link>https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/tags/export-controls/</link><description>Recent content in Export Controls on The Broomstick Brief</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.147.3</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/tags/export-controls/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The nuclear delusion</title><link>https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/posts/nuclear-delusion/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/posts/nuclear-delusion/</guid><description>&lt;p>The nuclear analogy is at the moment the most popular frame for thinking about advanced AI, and it is the most
comfortable one for the people who built the bomb metaphor&amp;rsquo;s home institutions. It carries an implicit theory of
control: states hold the technology, deterrence holds the states, and a small club of capable powers manages the rest
of the world&amp;rsquo;s exposure. That theory has a long pedigree and a familiar cast. It also, for Europe, leads somewhere
worth noticing before the door closes.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>