<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Zero-Trust on The Broomstick Brief</title><link>https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/tags/zero-trust/</link><description>Recent content in Zero-Trust on The Broomstick Brief</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.147.3</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/tags/zero-trust/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The trouble with calling it zero trust</title><link>https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/posts/zero-trust/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://broomstick.tymyrddin.dev/posts/zero-trust/</guid><description>The engineering claim behind zero trust is modest and sound. The name is neither. On what happens when a technical term borrows an ordinary word, and organisations organise around the metaphor.</description></item></channel></rss>